STAR Solutions Officially Ends Participation in All Future Work in the I-81 Corridor!


HOME | WHO WE ARE | OUR VISION | PARTNERS | LOCAL GOV'T PARTNERS  
 
HOT TOPICS
I-81 Freight Rail Study and Norfolk Southern Cresent Corridor compared and contrasted in new paper for CTB
11/18/07
Because both are rail intermodal efforts affecting the I-81 Corridor, there has been public confusion over what these two projects are and how they differ. In a new paper prepared for the Commonwealth Transportation Board meeting in Roanoke on November 7, RAIL Solution details the differences and highlights some curious ways the new NS direction departs from the vision of its own CEO, Wick Moorman (2nd item below). Read more...
Response to
"I-81 Crescent Corridor" Initiative
7/9/07
RAIL Solution has been asked our views on Norfolk Southern's recently announced "I-81 Crescent Corridor" initiative. To understand its significance, one has to separate what's old from what's new. Read more...
Norfolk Southern's
I-81 Strategy

10/19/06
Norfolk Southern President, Chairman, and CEO Charles "Wick" Moorman made a major address at Hotel Roanoke, which he called a "coming out party" for the railroad's I-81 strategy. Read more...
Read local
press coverage
of the issues

A Multi-State Plan Needs Multi-State Involvement

RAIL Solution is reaching out to Tennesseans, Pennsylvanians, Marylanders, and
West Virginians.


“Our neighbors need to know that the H-1581 process offers opportunity for significant transport- ation improvements at less cost to taxpayers, highway users and our environment up and down the I-81 Corridor. These citizens need to be pressing their transportation planners to gain access to the intermodal rail planning process.”

Dave Foster
RAIL Solution Exec. Dir.
contact>
Previous News
RAIL Solution Representatives Visit Truck Ferry Operation at Freiburg, Germany

On September 13, 2007, Executive Director David Foster spent an afternoon at Freiburg watching truck ferry trains load and unload. Also called rolling highway by some, this operational concept carries entire trucks. The trucks drive on and off the trains, and the drivers are carried in a sleeping car. The Freiburg terminal is matched with one at Navarro, Italy. Trucks load and unload all day at each point bound for the other. This 8-page pdf shows in photos and brief text descriptions what Foster and RAIL Solution member Jim Overholser found.

RAIL Solution advocates use of such an open intermodal approach in the I-81 Corridor because it can handle all trucks and because it can be cost-effective in corridors shorter than traditional rail intermodal. An I-81 Freight Rail Study is ongoing to test this and other possibilities in the I-81 Corridor between Knoxville, TN and Harrisburg, PA. The study is being funded and conducted jointly by Norfolk Southern Corporation and the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation, and is a direct result of HB-1581 which RAIL Solution secured passage of in the 2006 Virginia General Assembly.

RAIL Solution is monitoring implementation of a bill it sponsored in the Virginia legislature, H-1581: an act to determine conditions necessary to divert truck freight from Interstate Route 81. The act, originally authored by RAIL Solution, implements study of a Knoxville, Tn., to Harrisburg, Pa., corridor with fast, modern intermodal service operations to move freight off of I-81 and onto trains. Excerpts from H-1581.

Norfolk Southern Corp. stepped forward last summer to share financing and responsibility for conducting this rail feasibility study in cooperation with the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT). Norfolk Southern’s contractor, Woodside Consulting Group, expects to complete analysis in the summer of 2007.

DRPT contracted with Cambridge Systematics (the contractor which prepared the Freight Rail Bottom Line Report to review the Norfolk Southern/Woodside data in order to assure incorporation of the public interest written into the act. That is, to determine the extent to which rail may provide: less expensive, safer, and more environmentally friendly and fuel efficient alternative to the construction of additional highway capacity. Cambridge Systematics plans to complete its analysis in the fall of 2007.

On October 11, 2006, the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) voted to press forward with finalizing the Tier 1, Final Environmental Impact Statement.

It did so in order to allow VDOT to proceed with making limited safety improvements needed along I-81, as documented in the EIS. Before endorsing movement towards a final EIS though, the Board responded to intense lobbying by RAIL Solution members. The CTB voted unanimously to remove “additional highway capacity” from their summary of the draft EIS highway improvement conclusions and to insert “in refining the Tier 1 EIS and in developing the Tier II EIS, the findings of the ongoing, independent Interstate 81 Freight Rail Study should be fully utilized.”

The CTB also gave VDOT a green light to continue consideration of tolling I-81 and stated that the I-81 Corridor requires context sensitive design solutions.

We are also monitoring VDOT’s implementation of discreet safety improvements along I-81.

NEXT MEETING:
June 7th at 10am
Salem, VA


OF INTEREST
CSX's Innovative I-95 Corridor Proposal

Rail: Perpetually Underfunded

2006 Recap

PROBLEMS
with the
Tier 1 EIS

-Overview of DEIS.
-RS Response
-VDOT I-81 Site
-Write to VDOT>
-EIS Process Overview

Concerns for:
-Local Leaders
-Business Leaders
-Historic Sites
-Railroad Fans
-Environmentals


MEDIA COVERAGE
-Editorials/News
-Letters to Editor


LEARN MORE
RAIL Solution's I-81 Transportation Issues & Priorities

Maximize Rail/ Minimize Road Expansion


RESOURCES
-VA Gen. Assembly
-Analysis & Reports
-EIS Process
-PPTA Process
-Media Contacts
-Links
-Contact Us